Stephen Wolfram Livestreams


Future of Science & Technology Q&A (32 videos)

Biweekly ask-me-anything about the future of science & technology

icon

New episode streaming Friday, January 31, at 3:30pm ET. Submit your questions

Future of Science & Technology Q&A:
How will the future of mathematics change? ​​Would there be a way to use the Moon as a gravitational tugboat to slowly tow the Earth away from the expanding surface of the red giant Sun so it can stay in the Goldilocks Zone? What future applications do you think will come out with the discovery of the ability to measure at the attosecond time scale? Do you think that new conjectures could also be made by AI/AGI systems? How will humans tackle the abstraction and complexity of them? SW's TED Talk announcement + discussion of the Wolfram Physics Project ​​Could you speak a bit about energy "as the flux of causal edges through spacelike hypersurfaces"? Specifically, is there some more intuition or narrative you can provide as to why that is the case? On the topic of conferences, do you think technology will change the format? Or will panels and standard talks remain a constant? Will AIs one day be participants? What is it like to actually run a task on a supercomputer? Don't you fear humans will start to live mostly in digital worlds and most cognitive energy will be spent on problems there and not in the natural sciences? Would it be possible at some point to have both a digital and physical consciousness simultaneously? And then when you sleep, they combine or something to absorb the knowledge of both experiences? What if we take someone's videos, articles, life notes, a lot of things... and feed them into some specialized AI, and make it answer questions and behave almost like that person? That technology is not so far away... It feels a bit like "concussions transfer." Do you think it can be classified like that? ​​Stephen's livestreams are like mini sci-fi adventures for the mind. View Less »
View More »
Future of Science & Technology Q&A:
Future of Science & Technology Q&A:
Future of Science & Technology Q&A:
Do you think houses are going to change much in the future? Will we reach the age of true "smart houses"? Within the next 20 years, will "artificial intelligent" image recognition and/or image segmentation systems equal the accuracy of expert humans? For example, will an AI pathologist or radiologist equal the performance of a human pathologist or radiologist? How long do you estimate before AI can do creative mathematics? How will this technology be similar to or different from GPT? Do you think smartphones will replace desktop computing? Does it make sense to pursue a math degree in the age of AI? ​​Will different advanced AGIs try to compete with each other for resources? ​​Which is more of an existential threat: AI or quants? ​​Are we now stuck with COBOL running most of the world economy for the rest of our lives? In your opinion, is the concept of Maxwell's demon theoretically possible, and does it have the potential to violate the second law of thermodynamics? Furthermore, could you shed light on how computational limits may affect physical phenomena and our understanding thereof? And what about time: how are the second law of thermodynamics, computation and time connected? Stanisław Lem's Summa Technologiae made some strikingly accurate predictions about technology development back in the 1960s. What is your perspective on Lem's predictive prowess? Do you find it remarkable that such accurate foresight of the distant future is possible? I'd appreciate any thoughts you might have on the predictive power and limitations of technological forecasting. Were there ideas to put 10 months in a year? Can AI be used to create better prompts, or is that dependent on human consciousness? ​​Which will history judge as the biggest letdown: 2023's AI mania and panics, "VR is the inevitable near future" from the 2010s or the film A.I. Artificial Intelligence from 2001? Will AI-based tutors replace most human tutors in the next five years? View Less »
View More »
Future of Science & Technology Q&A:
Can you comment on the future of LLMs being run in the cloud vs. being run on one's local machine? Does the NANOGrav discovery spark ideas for experimental validation of the Physics Project? Can you discuss the next evolution for AI models? So far we have: language models, image > text (classifiers), text > image (generators), etc. What can be said for training multimodal AI models? Do you think that we have reached a point of singularity such that any child born from today onward will never be able to surpass AI at any intellectual task, i.e. are we the last "useful" generation? Is VR the future of UIs? Given the two contrasting scenarios of a "Pink Plasma Heaven," where artificial general intelligence optimally solves problems for all sentient life, and a "Matrix Hell," where AI exploits humans as energy sources, how can we establish a guiding framework to navigate between these extremes? To what degree do you think LLMs provide us with insights on the internal workings of our brain? Do you think there will be more lessons to learn from the structure of the human brain when designing the next generation of LLMs? Does the spread of LLMs incentivize scientists (and humans in general) to become more deeply specialized (to "out-compete" LLMs in a narrow domain) or to become more broadly spread (in order to creatively generate connections between apparently remote domains)? Will it be possible to use LLMs to achieve world peace? Or if world peace isn't big enough, can we beam LLM chats into outer space to try and get universal peace? What do you think of power laws? What do you think are some good entry points for explaining the principles behind power laws? What do you think of the future of AI in video games? They can be used to control the actions and dialog of NPCs, the design of the game's world and even the design of assets on the fly using little data. Video game assets can take up a lot of data, and if we could use AI to generate assets on the fly using a smaller amount of data, we could cut down on the download size of games as well as the effort needed to make assets. How will we be able, in the future, to tell what we're seeing on screen isn't AI generated? Anything we could do today? (I think you might be a bot.) Thinking in terms of inter-concept space, do you think there is an approach to using technology to develop a way in which we may better understand or gain experience to bridge the gap of inter-concept space between what we know and what we don't know? When will this statement, "I think you might be a bot", be a compliment, rather than a criticism or an insult? View Less »
View More »
Future of Science & Technology Q&A: