Stephen Wolfram Livestreams


History of Science & Technology Q&A (81 videos)

Biweekly ask-me-anything about the history of science & technology

icon

New episode streaming Wednesday, November 20, at 3:30pm ET. Submit your questions

History of Science & Technology Q&A:
History of Science & Technology Q&A:
History of Science & Technology Q&A:
History of Science & Technology Q&A:
Are the stars and constellations we see today the same that were seen by the ancient civilizations who first studied them? Do star positions ever change? What do you make of the relationship between rhetoric and math? They are held in contradistinction, but I am thinking of the relation between rhetorical invention and Chaitin's idea of math-creativity. What about sudden novas and comets? Sudden shifts in orbits? Is the Moon moving away measurable compared to human history? As in, since humans started recording history, did the Moon appear to get 10% smaller or so? How will history be able to correct the continuous conundrum of the accuracy of our forefathers' discoveries, inventions and ideas? Additionally, how can we as humans preserve this? How did early civilizations explain supernovas? Did they understand it as a star exploding? How did they come to this conclusion? "The stars are like the Sun, but far away." When said for the first time, this must have been crazy to hear for others. How often were ideas like these disregarded at first? How did researchers of this time convince society of their findings? Is it possible that errors in translation have affected results of research? Are there any examples of this in history? When was the first time anyone considered what the angle of our solar system's ecliptic is relative to the Milky Way's galactic plane? Apparently, the angle is about 60 degrees. Why did science evolve so rapidly in the Western world? What's there to say about alchemy in history? Is that because ethical questions are fundamentally computationally irreducible questions? How do you filter out the "good new" from the "bad new"? It's remarkable that old ideas stood the test of time. View Less »
View More »
History of Science & Technology Q&A:
When researching, do you find it's more helpful to stay close to modern times in terms of content, or do findings from hundreds of years ago also prove valuable? ​​Can you talk about the history of theories of cognition and consciousness? What did the ancients think? Did Gödel or Turing think about this much? Does ChatGPT disprove Penrose's Orch OR? Aristotle, Leibniz, Godel, Wolfram: How were/are these philosophers able to somewhat understand the idea of universal computation? How did they and you reach those insights? Is there something you could speak to about von Neumann's work to understand that the models of computation could relate to the mind? Has the importance of areas of science shifted in history? What was the main focus of science five hundred years ago? One hundred years ago? Ten? Is there a connection between these advances in science and education? Does education evolve with these changes? What has been the most important invention that has improved research overall? Right! By 1991 we had ERIC for upper-graduate research, and it was a game changer. No more need for librarians in the traditional way and history at our fingertips. Historically, what have been the the most difficult problems or obstacles for us to overcome or solve in the areas of science and technology? About unintended consequences of revolutions: what lessons from the Industrial Revolution have we learned that we could use for the AI revolution? Do you think it's fundamentally possible for science as we know it to hit a wall at some point and slowly degenerate into a nonproductive state? View Less »
View More »
History of Science & Technology Q&A: