Stephen Wolfram Livestreams


History of Science & Technology Q&A (81 videos)

Biweekly ask-me-anything about the history of science & technology

icon

New episode streaming Wednesday, November 20, at 3:30pm ET. Submit your questions

History of Science & Technology Q&A:
Do you think it will be possible to recreate historical figures as bots to interact with and get their perspective on current research areas? Why do many great mathematicians complete their most influential work in their early 20s? Does "prompting" (as for LLMs) have some historical precursors? So Feynman could have been a great prompt engineer (given that he was such a great expositor/teacher)? How do you think future researchers will look back at this current time in history? We look at bones and architecture to determine facts about the past; what will they look at to determine facts of our time? AI? ​​Can we restore old, lost books by reading other old books which talk about them? Seneca wrote many many letters. Could we detect if some have been wrongly attributed to him? I love a historian David Lewis's possible world that we can create alternative history/hypothetical situations to learn what went wrong historically. I just wonder whether AI can utilize deep learning to generate the sequence of historical events with the constraint of data and and recreate the alternative historical events with the known variables to generate hypothetical outcome? Isn't sonographic/x-raying safer than digging through ancient architecture? Or is it still dangerous somehow? They have been using muons to probe the pyramids in Egypt. Maybe AI can help with such more passive imaging through buildings? Neural network weights will be a more efficient means of archive through the centuries than books and libraries—which will matter as with ChatGPT the volume of published writing will climb exponentially. ​Prompting has relevance in psychology and philosophy. Could it be that the best prompter now are poets? Or better... computational poets? I don't think RAM or ROM-chips will survive the passage of time or solid state drives... View Less »
View More »
History of Science & Technology Q&A:
History of Science & Technology Q&A:
Please discuss the history of graph theory and network theory. What was the role of computation? So graph theory evolved as a theory after practice, like thermodynamics and the steam engine? Graphs as knowledge representation were popular in AI the late 60s, and more formally in theoretical CS a decade later. ​​Was it a big effort to integrate graphs in Wolfram Language? Is it missing some part of the recent developments? Has anyone formulated Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory in terms of graph theory? At what point in history did mathematics reach a level where a single individual could no longer learn all "known knowledge" at that time within their lifetime? It seems too often amazing discoveries go years without being picked up by a particular community. If Aristotle were alive today, how might he describe modern technology? How would one explain modern technology to someone from Aristotle's time? Would you say the words "soul" or "spirit" were used in the past in much the same way we use the term "software" today? Why would cellphones be inconceivable? They work the same way speech does. The only difference is that the ancients didn't know about the electromagnetic field. In your own experience, have there been any major changes to a field of study that changed the way one would view a certain topic? I remember being in school studying astronomy when Pluto was declared to no longer be a planet and my professor's lesson plan had to adapt in an instant. I like pondering what Professor Einstein may have been able to do with Wolfram|Alpha. View Less »
View More »
History of Science & Technology Q&A:
History of Science & Technology Q&A:
History of Science & Technology Q&A: