Stephen Wolfram Livestreams


Science & Technology Q&A for Kids & Others (155 videos)

Weekly ask-me-anything about science & technology

icon

New episode streaming Friday, February 7, at 3:30pm ET. Submit your questions

Science & Technology Q&A for Kids & Others:
Science & Technology Q&A for Kids & Others:
Are there nuclear reactions going on inside our bodies? Do you think we'll ever be able to replace damaged brain parts with computational parts as another form of prosthesis? What ethical implications will become relevant when we combine machine learning and brain sensors/effectors? Suppose a rule creates a memory in our brain. Then it could be an irreducible problem to make a true brain interface for any individual that could interpret a memory or preexisting concept. Truly a fascinating subject. Assuming we are able to completely understand the human brain, one could probably make a complete copy—basically, we could "fork" one brain into multiple copies! Do you think neurons do their signal processing based mostly on discrete states or the temporal difference between states? Even though all brains are different, don't they all "implement" the same underlying ideas? Doesn't this point to some Platonic realm of reality? One of the issues with being able to read and decode a memory is that someone will have the ability to write artificial memories into a brain. It's somewhat scary to think that could happen one day, but it could also be used for good. What about a Turing test, but for memories—like in Inception? Perhaps the only difference between dreams and reality is just a matter of degree? Perhaps it just depends on its logical coherence? Once the logical coherence is larger than what the brain can be aware of, it is considered "real." We've co-evolved with our environment so it should be coherent to us, but if we inject things into our environment that we haven't co-evolved with or evolved in, we get confused. View Less »
View More »
Science & Technology Q&A for Kids & Others:
Science & Technology Q&A for Kids & Others:
Science & Technology Q&A for Kids & Others:
Does gravity's strength cause a fundamental limit for the size a planet? What about a star? What about a black hole? What about a galaxy? What about the universe? Internal gas pressure and gravity are two main forces for star formation from nebulas. What was the pressure of the early universe vs. today? Just as a thought experiment. Can one stretch a vacuum beyond a "breaking point" similar to how matter can be compressed beyond a "breaking point" that leads to black holes? In both quantum field theory and general relativity, the zero-point energy seems to be arbitrary: you can add a constant to the equations and it will still be a valid solution. But in general relativity there seems to be a notion of absolute energy because of its gravitational effects. This zero point seems to be associated with flat space. Why is flat space non-gravitational, i.e. why is flat space the lowest possible energy state? Any ideas about "hacking nature" to gain powers (get infinite energy, travel faster than light, etc.). Do you think all these are possible at all? Can we really "hack" or "alter" the rules of nature? You can travel faster than light if the space between you and your destination changes; this happens quite frequently as the universe expands, and it's why we get measurements faster than the speed of light in space. It's just a fabrication. This brings up a related question. You cannot distinguish the geometry of empty space from that which has matter that is uniformly distributed. So it is perhaps uniformity that determines the geometry (without dark energy). But this assumes matter can be spread out like a fluid, instead of being discrete. So perhaps flat space is indeed the lowest-energy state. Uniform matter cannot exist because of the discreteness of matter, which leads inevitably to inhomogeneities. It's almost like you need to solve the puzzle of constructing the space you want to travel through before you can travel through it. Why is the refractive index for x-rays into matter smaller than 1? Does that mean that the speed of light for x-rays is faster in matter than in a vacuum? View Less »
View More »
Science & Technology Q&A for Kids & Others: